Flashcards Studio
Write, submit, and receive AI feedback with score breakdowns.
Question
Four homeowners filed one federal action against a window manufacturer and two local installers. Homeowners 1 and 2 bought the same model window from the same installer in the same subdivision, and both allege that a defective seal caused water intrusion after the same windstorm. Homeowner 3 bought a different model from the same manufacturer five years earlier and alleges that unrelated installation instructions were misleading. Homeowner 4 sues only one installer for breaking a patio door during a separate service call.
The complaint alleges warranty, negligence, and consumer-protection claims. The manufacturer moves to dismiss the entire action for misjoinder. Alternatively, it asks the court to sever the claims and order separate trials. The homeowners argue that all claims concern windows and home repairs, so they should proceed together.
How should the court rule? Discuss permissive joinder of plaintiffs and defendants, misjoinder, severance, and protective measures.